![]() |
| SOURCE: espnfivethirtyeight.files.wordpress.com |
First, the team wanting to bring in new players to their organization needs to thoroughly evaluate the player’s value before spending a major chunk of money. For example, the Florida Marlins (now called the Miami Marlins) were “linked to rumors involving [Albert] Pujols and [Prince] Fielder… though the Marlins are more likely to settle for [Hanley] Ramirez or [Jose] Reyes.” In this case, the Marlins realized that they were probably going to pay Pujols or Fielder more money than what they were worth mathematically if they elected to sign one of those high-profile players, so they believed that they could receive a better value by signing a player not quite as expensive but still quality. In other words, the Marlins had to settle for less because their financial situation did not permit them to spend high.
Second, the team must be aware of how their current roster looks before making significant changes. For instance,”the Boston Red Sox and the New York Yankees already have productive and expensive first basemen, so they aren't likely to enter the bidding for another one.” If teams, such as the Red Sox or Yankees, simply spend all their money on one position, the rest of the roster will have large holes with no money to spend to fill those holes. The key to having a good team is balance, and teams who do not follow that principle will run into the problem of scarcity.
In my next blog post I will research: What are the best ways for a team to improve other than within their own organization?

No comments:
Post a Comment